Is Crime Against Men Justified?

rohandharesh

Several anti-male laws have been passed by the governments on the pretext that women are oppressed. The truth is quite different. Men have been oppressed historically much more than women. This is, however, not to discount the difficulties of women. But, this cannot be a justification to pronounce that women alone are the oppressed gender. Based on this background, many people (especially male-feminists) justify crime against men - be it in the form of misuse of laws by women or by way of inflicting some other kind of pain on men. Today's men have no connection and cannot be held responsible for problems of women in earlier times. Similarly, today's women have no right to take refuge under the guise of historical wrongs done to women and dominate men. For one, historical wrongs were done much more to men than women. Men were forced to take the more difficult task of protecting and providing women. They were forced to tolerate and withstand pain and difficulty failing which he would cease to be a man. Men's tears were laughed at. PAIN OF A MAN WAS A JOKE FOR THE SOCIETY AND EVEN IN THE PRE-FEMINIST ERA, THERE WERE PLENTY OF MEN WHO WOULD ENJOY INFLICTING PAIN ON OTHER MEN WITH THE MOTIVE OF GETTING LAID. Now, the form and nature of this instinct has changed. But the basic cult of fighting other men to get at women and appease them to get laid has not changed! With this brief background, I would like to ask each one of you whether crime against men is justified on the pretext that men were perpetrators of crime against women. Truth is otherwise and men were themselves oppressed by unreasonable social norms.

Replies(5) | 2010-Aug-08

wewillmeet
08-Aug-10

Law makers ( I believe) have (had) good intentions when they make new law. But many of them do have Myopia.

rohandharesh
08-Aug-10

Law makers are the most corrupt in the society. Their real intentions are camouflaged under the cover of helping women. No govt. wants to solve any problem because the minute it does so, its role ceases.

wewillmeet
09-Aug-10

who is not corrupt ?....... start any discussion.... Police > yes.... Politicians > yes.... Lawyers > yes...... doctors > yes...... Engineers > yes ..... Clerks > yes..... Military >yes ..... business man > yes..... storekeeper > yes ....... ... . BUT who are they ? why to name them ?..... Those are not Imported from Sumalia, Nigeria or Afghanistan..... Fundamentally "We the people of India" are corrupt..... . whoever (mostly) got power gets corrupted, One who can't get power he becomes "God fearing person" ...... .... ...... .. (mostly)

wewillmeet
09-Aug-10

rohandharesh
11-Aug-10

So you agree that politicians are corrupt. Then, how can you claim that the law is intended for good? How can unconstitutional and inhuman laws, laws that are against gender equality be good? How can law makers who are criminals be expected to make noble laws?

This Discussion Forum is only available to registered members of SecondShaadi.com - Please Login or Register to reply